... Or are they?
Shopping bags seem to be the current poster-item for our consumer driven, earth destroying civilisation at the moment, shops are phasing them out, making you pay for them, making you buy $2.00 canvas bags instead of using plastic bags, coming out with more biodegradable bags instead of plastic, because apparently shopping bags make up xx% of landfill.
I don't know about you, but in my house, we use the shopping bags to put out rubbish in, in the bin. Unless they're crappy bags with holes in them, we re-use them, the only reason they make it into the landfill is because they're holding all our other garbage. If they take away plastic shopping bags, I am still going to need something to put my rubbish in, I don't think they want me using the canvas bags to carry my garbage. If I have to buy garbage bags, they are generally a thicker plastic than the shopping bags, which will take even longer to break down in landfill. Buying plastic bags means more industry is required to produce the bags, which means more pollution.
It seems to me that plastic bags are just the scape goat, sure there's a lot of them in landfill, but how about we take a look at what's
inside the plastic bags when they're at the landfill. What's inside? MORE PLASTIC. Shopping bags aren't the bad guy here, the packaging industry is. You buy a packet of biscuits, there's individual biscuits, wrapped in PLASTIC, sitting in a PLASTIC tray, and the whole thing is wrapped again in PLASTIC. How many things do you buy that are needlessly wrapped in 10 layers of plastic?
I think this whole shopping bag thing is just another example of governments pointing the finger at the easiest target instead of actually addressing the real issue. Is phasing out shopping bags really going to save the environment? Surely there are bigger things they could be doing? Of all the possible things we could be doing to "save the earth" is shopping bags really at the top of the list?
_________________
